As I have been hearing about some places removing holy water from their fonts again this year for Lent, I was taken back to the book I just finished - The Rite by Matt Bagglio. Is Holy Water just something that we should do without for a while? Satan and his minions certainly would seem to say yes because the book has numerous exorcisms, and almost all of them start out with the possessed person feeling normal, but when the priest sprinkles holy water on them, the demon can't hide, he lashes out, reveals his presence, and the exorcism begins in earnest. Uhm, thanks for the symbolism, but I'll continue to take my holy water at Church!
Father Z's blog has a great post about the inanity of removing holy water from the fonts of churches. I include some snippets below:
"Holy Water is a power weapon of the spiritual life against the attacks of the devil.
Holy water is a sacramental. It is not a toy, or something to be abstained from, like chocolate …. which is the stuff of a childish Lent.
Holy Water is not to be removed from fonts until after the Mass on Holy Thursday."
Fr. Z also notes that the Vatican helped clarify this a few years ago
"[From the Vatican] - The removing of Holy Water from the fonts during the season of Lent is not permitted, in particular, for two reasons:
1. The liturgical legislation in force does not foresee this innovation, which in addition to being praeter legem is contrary to a balanced understanding of the season of Lent, which though truly being a season of penance, is also a season rich in the symbolism of water and baptism, constantly evoked in liturgical texts.
2. The encouragement of the Church that the faithful avail themselves frequently of the [sic] of her sacraments and sacramentals is to be understood to apply also to the season of Lent. The “fast” and “abstinence” which the faithful embrace in this season does not extend to abstaining from the sacraments or sacramentals of the Church. The practice of the Church has been to empty the Holy Water fonts on the days of the Sacred Triduum in preparation of the blessing of the water at the Easter Vigil, and it corresponds to those days on which the Eucharist is not celebrated"
You can read the entirety of Fr. Z's post by clicking here
This also raises the insanity of not baptizing during Lent. This comes from nowhere other than some liberal Catholics deciding it would be nice symbolism to wait until Easter. Someone who goes for not doing baptisms during Lent can't really believe that Baptism is what we believe it is as a Church. Canon 867 paragraph 1 notes:
Parents are obliged to take care that infants are baptized in the first few weeks. As soon as possible after the birth or even before it, they are to go to the pastor to request the sacrament for their child and to be prepared properly for it.
HOLY WATER, the ROSARY and THE CROSS of CHRISTReplyDelete
are three powerfull weapons of exocism. To witness evil-spirits exorcized from beings while on Mission in Africa remains burnt into
my mind and soul..No Holy Water is not to be
taken lightly & often with great humor as the
priest sprinkles the congregation during rites.
A priest who jokes & laughs while performing
these most holy actions needs to witness an
exorcism and be in the "arena" of battle between Satan and the Holy Spirit...No laughter
their..only "tears of victory" When a priest
succumbs to a parishioners "demand" to remove
Holy Water from the font "in fear of obtaining
"the swine-flue" then his vocation validity is
in question. Political Correctiveness be damned
and has no place within our Sanctuaries.
Thank you Father for this post. I always thought it was odd for a parish to take away the Holy Water the season of Lent. As far as baptisms go, wow... after my son was born, we had to "wait" until after Lent for him to be baptized...ReplyDelete